Co-teaching Strategies in Action: Selection and Implementation in a Mathematics Course for Pre-service Teachers

Authors

Keywords:

mathematics teacher education research, co-teaching, teacher preparation, pre-service teachers, mathematics education

Abstract

Increasingly, teacher preparation programs are transitioning to a co-teaching model to better prepare future teachers for the co-teaching experiences they will likely encounter in their PK–12 careers when they share a classroom with another teacher. Despite this transition, co-teaching remains rare in undergraduate university courses. To address this issue, two mathematics teacher educators explored on a co-teaching model in an undergraduate mathematics content course for future elementary teachers. An interpretive qualitative analysis was conducted on primary data sources of instructor journal entries and observation protocol forms, with videos of instruction and lesson materials as secondary sources. Episodes of each co-teaching strategy employed was coded for rationale in selection, reflection on implementation, affordances, and limitations. University classroom examples are provided for each strategy. Findings indicate that co-teaching strategies have numerous impacts on the classroom, such as opportunities for students to learn, opportunities for teachers to learn, opportunities for teacher-student interaction, opportunities for teacher-teacher interaction, power dynamics among instructors, and logistics (such as classroom space and available manipulatives). Implications of this research include an increased understanding of a co-teaching model for instructors interested in implementing the model in university courses.

References

Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463538

Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W. & Dahlberg, K. (2008). Co-Teaching in higher education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v5i3.1298

Butler, E., Prieto, E., Osborn, J., Howley, P. Lloyd, A., Kepert, A., & Roberts, M. (2019). Learning across discipline boundaries through narrative inquiry: A study of collaboration to improve mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 21(2), 87–105.

Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ545936

Downton, A., Muir, T., & Livy, S. (2018). Linking theory and practice: A case study of a co-teaching situation between a mathematics teacher educator and a primary classroom teacher. Mathematics Teacher Education Development, 20(3), 102–118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1195986

Druken, B. K., & Marzocchi, A. S. (2019). Strings, bears, & boards: Making fractions meaning-filled. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 83(1), 54–60.

Druken, B. K., Marzocchi, A. S., & Brye, M. V. (2020). Facilitating collaboration between mathematics methods and content faculty through cross-departmental lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2020-0033

Dynak, J., Whitten, E., & Dynak, D. (1997). Refining the general education student teaching experience through the use of special education collaborative teaching models. Action in Teacher Education, 19(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1997.10462855

Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 147–159). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198527565.001.0001.

Ferguson, J., & Wilson, J. C. (2011). The co-teaching professorship: Power and expertise in the co-taught higher education classroom. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(1), 52–68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ942564

Gleason, J., Livers, S. & Zelkowski, J. (2017). Mathematics classroom observation protocol for practices (MCOP2 ): A validation study. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1308697

Goos, M., & Beswick, K. (Eds.). (2021). The learning and development of mathematics teacher educators: International perspectives and challenges. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8

Graziano, K. J., & Navarrete, L. A. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, compromise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 109–126. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ986819

Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press. https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Doing-Qualitative-Research-in-Education-Settings2

Hiesh, B., & Nguyen, H. (2015). Co-Teaching, co-leading, co-learning: Reflection on the co-teaching model in practicum. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(14), 1–9. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss14/7/

Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice, and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 3–31.

Jaworski, B. (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-Learners. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0828-0_14

Jaworski, B. (2008). Development of the mathematics teacher educator and its relation to teaching development. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 4 The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional. Sense Publishers.

Kamen, M., Junk, D. L., Marble, S., Cooper, S., Eddy, C. M., Wilkerson, T. L., & Sawyer, C. (2011). Walking the talk: Lessons learned by university mathematics methods instructors implementing lesson study for their own professional development. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 165–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9941-9

King-Sears, M. E., Jenkins, M. C., & Brawand, A. E. (2018). Co-teaching perspectives from middle school algebra co-teachers and their students with and without disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1465134

King-Sears, M. E., Brawand, A. E., Jenkins, M. C., & Preston-Smith, S. (2014). Co-teaching perspectives from secondary science co-teachers and their students with disabilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(6), 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9391-2

Lam, C., Danforth, M., & Hughes, R. (2020 June). Lessons from a lower-division mathematics co-teaching sequence. Paper presentation at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34907

Livy, S., Downton, A., & Muir, T. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ knowledge for teaching in the early years: Selecting and sequencing. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(3), 17–35.

Lock, J., Clancy, T., Lisella, R., Rosenau, P., Ferreira, C., & Rainsbury, J. (2016). The lived experiences of instructors co-teaching in higher education. Brock Education Journal, 26(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v26i1.482

Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 193–205. http://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html

Mariano-Dolesh, M. L., Collantes, L. M., Ibanez, E. D., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Mindset and levels of conceptual understanding in the problem-solving of preservice mathematics teachers in an online learning environment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.2

Muir, T., Bragg, L, & Livy, S. (2018). Engagement and impact: A focus on mathematics teacher educators’ studies into practice. Mathematics Teacher Education Development, 20(3), 1–9. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/495

Ratey, J. J. (2008). Spark: The revolutionary new science of exercise and the brain. Hachette Book Group. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/john-j-ratey-md/spark/9780316113502/

Sebald, A. M., Howe, J., & Balgopal, M. M. (2022). The impact of co‐teaching on the professional practices of veteran, novice, and potential science and mathematics teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 122(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12508

Sowder, J., Sowder, L., & Nickerson, S. (2014). Reconceptualizing mathematics. W. H. Freeman.

Strogilos, V., & King-Sears, M. E. (2018). Co-teaching is extra help and fun: Perspectives on co-teaching from middle school students and co-teachers. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12427

Weinberg, A. E., Sebald, A., Stevenson, C. A., & Wakefield, W. (2020). A scoping review of coteaching in teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 55(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1657214

Yopp, R. H., Ellis, M. W., Bonsangue, M. V., Duarte, T., & Meza, S. (2014). Piloting a co-teaching model for mathematics teacher preparation: Learning to teach together. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1), 91–111. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1045811

Downloads

Published

2024-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles