Challenges of Teaching with Challenging Tasks: Teaching Dilemmas Arising from Implementing a Reform-oriented Approach to Primary Mathematics
Keywords:
mathematics education research, teaching dilemmas, challenging tasks, developmental education in mathematics, implementation of reform-orientated teachingAbstract
The research reported in this paper analyses teaching dilemmas experienced by four in-service teachers in the context of a reform-oriented teaching approach for primary mathematics called Developmental Education in Mathematics (DEM). The findings exemplify three teaching dilemmas: Whether to tell students how to solve a challenging task; what to do when students are bored with an important task; and trying to keep the pace of the lesson while supporting all students in the classroom. Importantly, the origins of these dilemmas were found to lie in internal tensions between the components of the DEM system, which the teachers had implemented. Finally, the implications for development of curricular material, implementation of reform-oriented teaching approaches, and the professional development of teachers are discussed.
References
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1002018
Ball, D. L. (2017). Uncovering the special mathematical work of teaching. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_2.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bass, H., & Mosvold, R. (2019, February). Teacher responses to public apparent student error: A critical confluence of mathematics and equitable teaching practice. In Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (No. 7). Freudenthal Group; Freudenthal Institute; ERME. https://hal.science/hal-02430043
Bailey, J., & Taylor, M. (2015). Experiencing a mathematical problem-solving teaching approach: Opportunities to identify ambitious teaching practices. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 17(2), 111–124. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/260
Battey, D., & Franke, M. L. (2008). Transforming identities: Understanding teachers across professional development and classroom practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 127–149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478985
Baxter, J. A., & Williams, S. (2010). Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9121-4
Ben‐Peretz, M., & Kremer‐Hayon, L. (1990) The content and context of professional dilemmas encountered by novice and senior teachers. Educational Review, 42(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191900420104
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Brodie, K. (2010). Pressing dilemmas: Meaning‐making and justification in mathematics teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903149873
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Caspari-Gnann, I., & Sevian, H. (2022). Teacher dilemmas as sources of change and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103629
Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_6
English, L. D. (2011). Complex learning through cognitively demanding tasks. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1227
Floden, R. E., & Clark, C. M. (1988). Preparing teachers for uncertainty. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 505–524.
Frid, S. (2000). Constructivism and reflective practice in practice: Challenges and dilemmas of a mathematics teacher educator. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2, 17–33. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/127
Gjære, Å. L., & Blank, N. (2019). Teaching mathematics developmentally: Experiences from Norway. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(3), 28–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26854431
Jankvist, U. T., Aguilar, M. S., Misfeldt, M., & Koichu, B. (2022). How about fidelity? Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-02012020
Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.55.2.56142234616x4352
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modelling. In F. K. Jr. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). NCTM.
Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.): Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives (pp. 117–135). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8
Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2006). Designing and using mathematical tasks. Tarquin.
Mellroth, E., Bergwall, A., & Nilsson, P. (2021). Task design for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability mathematics classrooms: Manifestations of contradictions in a professional learning community. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 78–96. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/664
Mosvold, R., Wæge, K., & Fauskanger, J. (2023). Teacher time out as a site for studying mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, 101037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101037
Osborne, M. D. (1997) Balancing individual and the group: A dilemma for the constructivist teacher. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202797184125
Philipp, R. A. (1995, October 21–24). Two prospective teachers struggle with the teaching-is-not-telling dilemma. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 17th PME-NA, Columbus, OH. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED389599
Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of educational research, 77(2), 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2017). How does lesson structure shape teacher perceptions of teaching with challenging tasks? Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 30–46. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/348
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). Macmillan.
Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Charalambous, C. Y., & Mills, V. (2011). Exploring the curriculum implementation plateau. In J. T. Remilliard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (Chapter 17). Routledge.
Skott, J. (2008, 5–8 March). A cautionary note: Is research still caught up in an implementer approach to the teacher? Symposium on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of ICMI, Rome, Italy. https://www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/WG2/Papers/SKOTT.pdf
Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0636
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
Sullivan, P., Askew, M., Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D., Mornane, A., Roche, A., & Walker, N. (2015). Supporting teachers in structuring mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9279-2
Tokheim, E. H. (2015). En analyse av tre norske læreverk i matematikk for 1. trinn. [An analysis of three Norwegian mathematics textbook series for Grade 1] [Doctoral thesis, University of Stavanger]. https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/handle/11250/299385
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986) Thought and language: Revised edition (English and Russian edition edited by A. Kozulin). The MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
Wilhelm, A. G. (2014). Mathematics teachers' enactment of cognitively demanding tasks: Investigating links to teachers' knowledge and conceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 636–674. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0636
Zankov, L. V. (1964). Problems of primary education. Soviet Education, 6(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-939306063
Zankov, L. V. (1977). Teaching and development: A Soviet investigation. M. E. Sharpe.
