Extending the Notion of Specialized Content Knowledge: Proposing constructs for SCK

Mun Yee Lai, Julie Clark

Abstract


While it is widely believed that Specialized Content Knowledge (SCK) is essential to effective and quality mathematics teaching, the specific constructs that compose SCK remain underspecified. This paper describes the development and use of a new framework that extends the notion of SCK.  The framework was trialled with a cohort of 90 first year Bachelor of Education (Primary) pre-service teachers who enrolled in a regional Australian university. The preservice teachers undertook a mathematics test, which required them to address school students’ misconceptions and to explain specific mathematical concepts. Resultant data (i.e., the pre-service teachers’ responses to the written test) provided an empirical basis for the proposed constructs of SCK. The analysis of the data allowed insight into the central question: whether the proposed framework enables researchers to unfold details of SCK. Ultimately, we aim to conceptualise the constructs of SCK through elaborating the theoretical and empirical basis.

Keywords


evaluation of mathematics content knowledge for teaching, mathematical explanations, mathematical representations, mathematics teacher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Authors. (2012). In 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education. Seoul, South Korea: ICME.

Authors. (2015). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Azevedo, N. A., van Dooren, W., Clareboot, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(5), 627-636.

Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th ed.). New York, NY, USA: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co Cognitive

Ball, D. L. (1990a). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.

Ball, D. L. (1990b). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.

Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C. & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, 29(3), 14-46.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., Bass, H., Sleep, L., Lewis, J., & Phelps, G. (2009). A practiced-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 95-98). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.

Ball, D.L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.

Beswick, K. & Goos, M. (2012). Measuring pre-service teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 70-90.

Bisanz, J., & LeFevre, J. (1992). Understanding elementary mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 113–136). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University.

Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel Publishing Company.

Font, V., Godino, J. D., & D’Amore, B. (2007). An onto-semiotic approach to representations in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 2-14.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97(3), 223-249.

Gagatsis, A., & Shiakalli, M. (2004). Ability to translate from one representation of the concept of function to another and mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 24(5), 645-657.

Gallant, A. & Mayer, D. (2012). Teacher performance assessment in teacher education: An example in Malaysia. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 295-307.

Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684-689.

Hiebert, J. (1992). Mathematical, cognitive, and instructional analyses of decimal fraction. In Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R. & Hattrup, R. A. (Eds), Analysis of arithmetic for Mathematics teaching (pp.283-321). Hillsdale, NJ : L. Erlbaum Associates.

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational researcher, 25(4), 12-21.

Hiebert, J. & Wearne, J. (1986). Procedures over concepts: The acquisition of decimal number knowledge. In J, Heibert (Eds), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of Mathematics (pp.199-223). Hillsdale, NJ : L. Erlbaum Associates.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers' Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.

Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L.. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching on student. American Educational Research Association, 42(2), 371-406.

Isiksal, M. & Carkiroglu, E. (2011). The nature of prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: the case of multiplication of fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(3), 213-230.

Izsak, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 95-143.

Koirala,H. P., Davis, M. & Johnson, P. (2007). Development of a performance assessment task and rubric to measure prospective secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 127-138.

Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Elementary school students’ use of mathematically-based and practically-based explanations: The case of multiplication. In M. Hoines, & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 241-248). Bergen, Norway: PME.

Levenson, E., Tsamir, P. & Tirosh, D. (2010). Mathematically based and practically based explanations in the elementary school: teachers’ preferences. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 345–369.

Lin, Y. C., Chin, C. & Chiu, H.Y. (2011). Developing an instrument to capture high school mathematics teachers’ specialized content knowledge: An exploratory study. In Ubuz, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 353). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

Lowery, N. V. (2002). Construction of teacher knowledge in context: Preparing elementary teacher to teach mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 10(2), 68-83.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for schools mathematics. Reston, Va: NCTM.

Newmark, J., & Lake, F. (1974). Mathematics as a second language. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Education Research Journal, 45(4), 1080-1110.

Ocheful, A. S. (2013). Development of the concept of multiplication with fraction. Universal Journal of Education and General Studies, 2(3), 79-83.

Pape, S. J., Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into practice, 40(2), 118-127.

Presmeg, N. C. (1999, October). On visualization and generalization in mathematics. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty first annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp.151-155). Columbus, OH.: Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

Raman, M. (2002). Coordinating informal and formal aspects of mathematics: Student behaviour and textbook message. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(2), 135-150.

Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346-362.

Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Silverman, J. & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 499-511.

Usiskin, Z. (1987). Resolving the continuing dilemmas in school geometry. In M. M. Lindquist & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), Learning and teaching geometry K-12 (pp.17-31). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Watkins, D. A. & Biggs, J. B. (2001). The paradox of the Chinese learner and beyond. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp.3-23). Melbourne, Australia: ACER.

Wearne, D.& Hiebert, J. (1988). A cognitive approach to meaningful mathematics instruction: Testing a local theory using decimal numbers. Journal for research in mathematics education, 19 (5), 371-384.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.