### Extending the Notion of Specialized Content Knowledge: Proposing constructs for SCK

#### Abstract

*Specialized Content Knowledge*(SCK) is essential to effective and quality mathematics teaching, the specific constructs that compose SCK remain underspecified. This paper describes the development and use of a new framework that extends the notion of SCK. The framework was trialled with a cohort of 90 first year Bachelor of Education (Primary) pre-service teachers who enrolled in a regional Australian university. The preservice teachers undertook a mathematics test, which required them to address school students’ misconceptions and to explain specific mathematical concepts. Resultant data (i.e., the pre-service teachers’ responses to the written test) provided an empirical basis for the proposed constructs of SCK. The analysis of the data allowed insight into the central question: whether the proposed framework enables researchers to unfold details of SCK. Ultimately, we aim to conceptualise the constructs of SCK through elaborating the theoretical and empirical basis.

#### Keywords

#### Full Text:

PDF#### References

Authors. (2012). In 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education. Seoul, South Korea: ICME.

Authors. (2015). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Azevedo, N. A., van Dooren, W., Clareboot, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(5), 627-636.

Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th ed.). New York, NY, USA: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co Cognitive

Ball, D. L. (1990a). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.

Ball, D. L. (1990b). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.

Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C. & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, 29(3), 14-46.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., Bass, H., Sleep, L., Lewis, J., & Phelps, G. (2009). A practiced-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 95-98). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.

Ball, D.L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.

Beswick, K. & Goos, M. (2012). Measuring pre-service teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 70-90.

Bisanz, J., & LeFevre, J. (1992). Understanding elementary mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 113–136). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University.

Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel Publishing Company.

Font, V., Godino, J. D., & D’Amore, B. (2007). An onto-semiotic approach to representations in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 2-14.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97(3), 223-249.

Gagatsis, A., & Shiakalli, M. (2004). Ability to translate from one representation of the concept of function to another and mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 24(5), 645-657.

Gallant, A. & Mayer, D. (2012). Teacher performance assessment in teacher education: An example in Malaysia. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 295-307.

Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684-689.

Hiebert, J. (1992). Mathematical, cognitive, and instructional analyses of decimal fraction. In Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R. & Hattrup, R. A. (Eds), Analysis of arithmetic for Mathematics teaching (pp.283-321). Hillsdale, NJ : L. Erlbaum Associates.

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational researcher, 25(4), 12-21.

Hiebert, J. & Wearne, J. (1986). Procedures over concepts: The acquisition of decimal number knowledge. In J, Heibert (Eds), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of Mathematics (pp.199-223). Hillsdale, NJ : L. Erlbaum Associates.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers' Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.

Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L.. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching on student. American Educational Research Association, 42(2), 371-406.

Isiksal, M. & Carkiroglu, E. (2011). The nature of prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: the case of multiplication of fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(3), 213-230.

Izsak, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 95-143.

Koirala,H. P., Davis, M. & Johnson, P. (2007). Development of a performance assessment task and rubric to measure prospective secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 127-138.

Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Elementary school students’ use of mathematically-based and practically-based explanations: The case of multiplication. In M. Hoines, & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 241-248). Bergen, Norway: PME.

Levenson, E., Tsamir, P. & Tirosh, D. (2010). Mathematically based and practically based explanations in the elementary school: teachers’ preferences. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 345–369.

Lin, Y. C., Chin, C. & Chiu, H.Y. (2011). Developing an instrument to capture high school mathematics teachers’ specialized content knowledge: An exploratory study. In Ubuz, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 353). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

Lowery, N. V. (2002). Construction of teacher knowledge in context: Preparing elementary teacher to teach mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 10(2), 68-83.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for schools mathematics. Reston, Va: NCTM.

Newmark, J., & Lake, F. (1974). Mathematics as a second language. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Education Research Journal, 45(4), 1080-1110.

Ocheful, A. S. (2013). Development of the concept of multiplication with fraction. Universal Journal of Education and General Studies, 2(3), 79-83.

Pape, S. J., Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into practice, 40(2), 118-127.

Presmeg, N. C. (1999, October). On visualization and generalization in mathematics. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty first annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp.151-155). Columbus, OH.: Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

Raman, M. (2002). Coordinating informal and formal aspects of mathematics: Student behaviour and textbook message. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(2), 135-150.

Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346-362.

Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Silverman, J. & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 499-511.

Usiskin, Z. (1987). Resolving the continuing dilemmas in school geometry. In M. M. Lindquist & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), Learning and teaching geometry K-12 (pp.17-31). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Watkins, D. A. & Biggs, J. B. (2001). The paradox of the Chinese learner and beyond. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp.3-23). Melbourne, Australia: ACER.

Wearne, D.& Hiebert, J. (1988). A cognitive approach to meaningful mathematics instruction: Testing a local theory using decimal numbers. Journal for research in mathematics education, 19 (5), 371-384.

### Refbacks

- There are currently no refbacks.