Conceptualisation of an Undergraduate Primary Mathematics Specialisation

Authors

  • Heather McMaster The University of Sydney
  • Jennifer Way The University of Sydney
  • Janette Bobis The University of Sydney

Keywords:

mathematics teacher education, mathematics specialisation, government policy, socio-spatial approach, teacher employers

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been unprecedented regulation of initial teacher education (ITE). The objective of this study was to generate an in-depth understanding of the structural challenges faced by tertiary educators as they responded to a federal policy and a related state government policy in teacher education. The policies imposed on ITE reach through tertiary education providers and into school classrooms. To capture the three spaces of (1) policy makers, (2) tertiary education providers and (3) teacher education graduates, this study adopts a socio-spatial approach as both a conceptual organiser and an analytical stance. One specific case is detailed, namely one metropolitan university’s establishment of a pathway enabling pre-service primary teachers to specialise in mathematics teaching. The study then follows two graduates into their first two years of teaching. The findings generated are potentially transferable to other contexts. We conclude that to reap the benefits of ITE policies, tertiary education providers and all employers of teachers need common expectations for their role in implementing these policies. Also, support for graduates needs to be sustained through liaising between tertiary education providers and employers.

Author Biography

Heather McMaster, The University of Sydney

Sydney School of Education and Social Work (Lecturer)

References

Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. (2013). A new vision of mentoring in teacher education. In E. Lynch & T. Yeigh (Eds.), Teacher education in Australia: Investigations into programming, practicum and partnership (pp. 77–93). Oxford Global Press.

Ardzejewska, K., McMaugh, A., & Coutts, P. (2010). Delivering the primary curriculum: The use of subject specialist and generalist teachers in NSW. Issues in Educational Research, 20(3), 203–219.

Australian Government. (2015). Action now: Classroom ready teachers: Australian Government response. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/action-now-classroom-ready-teachers-australian-government-response

Australian Government. (2022). Next steps: Report of the quality initial teacher education review. https://www.education.gov.au/quality-initial-teacher-education-review/resources/next-steps-report-quality-initial-teacher-education-review

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia guideline: Primary specialisation. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/guideline-primary-specialisation.pdf?sfvrsn=1ffec3c_0

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2022). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and Procedures (First published 2011. Revised 2015, 2018, & 2019). https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/accreditation-of-initial-teacher-education-programs-in-australia---standards-and-procedures

Board of Studies Teaching and Education Standards. (2016). Learning to teach primary mathematics. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/wcm/connect/6c7653df-1710-4028-bbd9-bc4c967113dc/Learning-Teach%E2%80%93Primary%E2%80%93Mathematics.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=

Bourke, T., Mills, R., & Siostrom, E. (2020). Origins of primary specialisation in Australian education policy: What’s the problem represented to be? The Australian Educational Researcher, 47, 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00370-y

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brobst, J. A., & Markworth, K. A. (2019). Elementary content specialization: Perspectives on perils and promise. School Science and Mathematics, 119(7), 369–381.

Campbell, P., & Malkus, N. (2013). Elementary mathematics specialists: Influencing student achievement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(3), 198–205.

Cavanagh, M., & McMaster, H. (2017). A specialist professional experience learning community for primary pre-service teachers focused on mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 47–65.

Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500603

Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2006). The collective mediation of a high-stakes accountability program: Communities and networks of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(2), 80–100.

Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. SAGE Publications.

Curry, T. (2017). A comparative study of elementary mathematics specialists and mathematics coaches on fourth grade students' mathematics achievement. [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University].

Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2015). National STEM school education strategy. https://www.education.gov.au/education-ministers-meeting/resources/national-stem-school-education-strategy

Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2021). STEM education initiatives synthesis report. https://www.dese.gov.au/education-ministers-meeting/resources/stem-education-initiatives-synthesis-report

Downton, A., Cheeseman, J., & Roche, A. (2022). Goals and challenges of school mathematics leaders. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 24(1), 96–115.

Driscoll, K. (2017). Primary school mathematics leaders’ views of their mathematics leadership role. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: We are still learning! Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne (pp. 213–220). MERGA.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., & Rönnerman, K. (2020). Middle leadership in schools: A practical guide for leading learning. Routledge.

Hudson, P. (2012). How can schools support beginning teachers? A call for timely induction and mentoring for effective teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37(7), Article 6. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol37/iss7/6

Jorgensen, R. (2016). Middle leadership: A key role in numeracy reform. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(3), 32–37.

Liu, F. (2011). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of departmentalization of elementary schools. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 7(1), 40–52.

Lomas, L. (2022). Preparing job-embedded primary mathematics specialists to lead in Australian schools. In N. Fitzallen, C. Murphy, V. Hatisaru & N. Maher (Eds.), Mathematical confluences and journeys. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Launceston (pp. 346–353). MERGA.

Louden, W. (2008). 101 Damnations: the persistence of criticism and the absence of evidence about teacher education in Australia, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802037777

Main, S., Byrne, M., Scott, J., Sullivan, K., Paoline, A., Slater, E., & Boron, J. (2023). Primary specialisations in Australia: Graduate perceptions of outcome and impact. The Australian Educational Researcher, 50, 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00496-y

Markworth, K. A., Brobst, J., Ohana, C., & Parker, R. (2016). Elementary content specialization: Models, affordances, and constraints. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–19.

Mayer, D. (2016). Policy driven reforms and the role of teacher educators in professionalising teacher education. In B. De Wever, R. Vanderlinde, M. Tuytens, & A. Aelterman (Eds.), Professional learning in education: Challenges for teacher educators, teachers and student teachers (pp. 23–37). Academia Press.

McMaster, H., Way, J., Bobis, J. & Beswick, K. (2018). Principals' perceptions and expectations of primary teachers with a specialisation in Mathematics. In J. Hunter, P. Perger & L. Darragh, (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Auckland (pp. 551–558). MERGA.

https://merga.net.au/common/Uploaded%20files/Annual%20Conference%20Proceedings/2018%20Annual%20Conference%20Proceedings/McMaster.pdf

Mills, R., Bourke, T., & Siostrom, E. (2020). Complexity and contradiction: Disciplinary expert teachers in primary science and mathematics education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, Article 103010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103010

Myers, K., Auslander S., Smith, S., & Smith, M. (2020). prospective elementary mathematics specialists’ developing instructional practices: Support and mentorship during an authentic residency. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09460-6

New South Wales Department of Education. (2021). Primary mathematics specialisations in initial teacher education. https://education.nsw.gov.au/about-us/educational-data/cese/publications/cese-evaluations/primary-mathematics-specialisations-in-initial-teacher-education

New South Wales Department of Education. (2023). NSW mathematics strategy 2025. March 2023 update. https://education.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/main-education/about-us/strategies-and-reports/nsw-mathematics-strategy/NSW-mathematics-strategy.pdf

New South Wales Education Standards Authority. (2016). Subject content knowledge requirements for primary teaching specialisation policy. https://www.educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/teacher-accreditation/resources/policies-procedures/subject-content-knowledge-requirements-for-primary-teaching-specialisations-policy

New South Wales Government. (2013). Great teaching inspired learning: A blueprint for action. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/wcm/connect/b3826a4c-7bcf-4ad1-a6c9-d7f24285b5e3/GTIL+A+Blueprint+for+Action.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=

Pezaro C. (2017, February 13). Specialist science and maths teachers in primary schools are not the solution. Australian Association for Research in Education Blog. https://www.aare.edu.au/blog/?p=2012

Prinsley, R., & Johnston, E. (2015). Transforming STEM education in Australian primary schools: Everybody’s business. Australian Government, Office of the Chief Scientist. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/sites/default/files/Transforming-STEM-teaching_FINAL.pdf

Robinson, E., Bordon, L., & Carter, E. (2021). Building teacher capacity and leadership in elementary mathematics classrooms in Nova Scotia: Review of the Certificate in Elementary Mathematics Pedagogy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21, 856–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00183-1

Roche, A., Russo, J., Kalogeropoulos, P. & Vale, C. (2022). Aspirations for mathematics learning: the voice of primary mathematics middle leaders. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 34, (4), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00360-9

Rowan, L., Mayer, D., Kline, J., Kostogriz, A., & Walker-Gibbs, B. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of teacher education for early career teachers in diverse settings: The longitudinal research we have to have. Australian Education Researcher, 42, 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0163-y

Sexton, M., & Downton, A. (2014). School mathematics leaders’ perceptions of successes and challenges of their leadership role within a mathematics improvement project. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sydney (pp. 581–588). MERGA.

Sleeter, C. (2014). Toward teacher education research that informs policy. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14528752

Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/action-now-classroom-ready-teachers

Vale, C., Roche, A., Cheeseman, J., Gervasoni, A., Livy, S. & Downton, A. (2023). The practices of middle leaders of mathematics: alignment of their goals and activities. School Leadership & Management, 43(3), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2179982

Victoria State Government. (2017). Victorian Government schools agreement 2017. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/hrweb/Documents/VGSA-2017.pdf

Way, J., Attard, C., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., McMaster, H., Cartwright, K. (2020). Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4269-5

Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-27

Issue

Section

Articles