Characteristics of Collaborative Learning in Teacher Professional Development: A Systematic Review
Keywords:
teacher professional development, systematic review, activity theory, collaborative learning, PLCAbstract
Professional Learning Communities (PLC) have been used increasingly in designing and discussing teachers' professional development, but how PLC are organised and framed differ between contexts. There is a lack of meta-level studies that aim to define and compare different ways of organising PLC. In this literature review of 32 studies, Cultural-historical Activity Theory (CHAT) is used as an analytical lens to examine different models for PLC in mathematics. By examining and comparing PLC in mathematics, the review aims to expand understanding of how PLC in mathematics can be organised and framed. The result revealed three distinctive activity systems with different objects: developing norms for collaboration, developing teachers’ understanding about mathematics and its teaching, and developing teachers’ repertoire of teaching actions. The activity systems vary concerning the use of mediating artifacts and the norms that regulate each activity system, but are similar regarding participants, context, and division of labor. The review indicates that the teachers participating in PLC in mathematics change their norms of collaboration, enhance their understanding of mathematics and its teaching, and/or enhance their ability to design and carry out mathematics teaching. Our findings can assist designers, organisers, participants, and researchers in making informed decisions about PLC in mathematics.
References
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/749161
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conzeptualization and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.
Erixon, E.-L., & Wahlström, N. (2016). In-service training programmes for mathematics teacher nested in transnational policy discourses. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 94-109.
Foot, K. A. (2014). Cultural-historical activity theory: Exploring a theory to inform practice and research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2013.831011
Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking collaboratively. Learning in a community of inquiry. Routledge.
Gedera, D., & Williams, J. (2016). Preface. In D. Gedera & J. Williams (Eds.), Activity theory in education. research and practice. Sense Publisher.
Gough, D., Thomas, J., & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teacher and Teaching Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Routledge.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A syntheses of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Heck, D., Banilower, E., Weiss, I., & Rosenberg, S. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF's local systematic change through teacher enhancement iniative. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2), 113-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034894
Hirsh, Å., & Segolsson, M. (2019). Enabling teacher-driven school-development and collaborative learning: An activity theory-based study of leadership as an overaching practice. Education Management Adminitration & Leadership, 47(3), 400-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739363
Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2006(9), 187-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z
Katz, S., & Ain Dack, L. (2012). Intentional interruption: Breaking down learning barriers to transform professional practice. Corwin Press.
Knapp, M. C. (2017). An autoethnography of a (reluctant) teacher leader. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46(2017), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.02.004
Krainer, K., & Spreitzer, C. (2020, February 3-7). Collaborative groups in mathematics teacher education: Grasping the diversity of roles, identities and interactions [Paper presentation]. ICMI Study 25, Lisabone, Portugal.
Langelotz, L. (2017). Kollegialt lärande i praktiken: Kompetensutveckling eller kollektiv korrigering? Natur & kultur
Levine, T. H. (2010). Tools for the study and design of collaborative teacher learning: The affordances of different conceptions of teacher communities and activity theory. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/23479301
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757-798. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163415
Makopoulou, K., & Armour, K. (2014). Possibilities and challenges in teachers’ collegial learning. Education Review, 66(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.768955
Mwanza, D. (2002). Conceptualising work activity for CAL systems design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00214.x
Öhman Sandberg, A. (2014). Hållbar programutveckling. En studie av betydelsen av expansivt lärande och delvis delade objekt. [Doctoral dissertation, Jönköping University] Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:715548/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. OECD Publishing.
Perez, M., Anand, P., Speroni, C., Parrish, T., Esra, P., Socias, M., & Gubbins, P. (2007). Successful California schools in the context of educational adequacy. American Institutes for Research.
Robutti, O., Cusi, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Goos, M., Isoda, M., & Joubert, M. (2016). ICME international survey on teachers working and learning through collaboration: June 2016. Mathematics Education, 2016(48), 651-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0797-5
Ryve, A., Hemmi, K. & Kornhall, P. (2016). Skola på vetenskaplig grund [School on a scientific basis]. (1st ed.). Natur & Kultur.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Swedish National Agency for Education. (2017). Kollegialt lärande för bestående kompetensutveckling. https://larportalen.skolverket.se/#/4_Kollegialtlarande
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environment.. Springer.
