The Nature of Feedback Given to Elementary Student Teachers from University Supervisors after Observations of Mathematics Lessons
Keywords:
feedback, preservice elementary teachers, mathematics, field experience, university supervisorAbstract
This research explores the frequency and nature of mathematics-specific feedback given to elementary student teachers by university supervisors across a collection of post-lesson observation forms. Approximately one-third of the forms (n=250) analysed from five large universities had no comments related to mathematics. Forms that did have mathematics-specific feedback varied in terms of the number of summary, strength, and suggestion (i.e., type) comments and in the pedagogical focus (e.g., tasks, discourse) of those comments. Chi-square tests of independence indicated the frequency of forms with mathematics-specific feedback differed significantly by university. Results of additional Chi-square tests showed significant interactions between the type of comments and university and between the pedagogical foci of the comments and comment type. Contributing factors and implications, including connectedness of the university supervisors to the programs, professional development provided to university supervisors, and the organization of the forms, are discussed.
References
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2006). Standards for excellence in teaching mathematics in Australian schools. Adelaide, SA: AAMT.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Sydney: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/learning_areas/mathematics.html.
Ball, D.L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T.A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development. The Elementary School Journal, 109 (5), 458-474. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/596996
Black, P & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Borko, H., & Mayfield, V., (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university
supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 501-518. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00008-8
Borko H., and Putnam, R., (1996). Learning to teach. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (673-708). New York: Macmillan.
Chalies, S., Ria, L., Bertone, S., Trohel, J., & Durand, M. (2004). Interactions between preservice and cooperating teachers and knowledge construction during post-lesson interviews. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 765-781. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.001
Cheng, M.M., & Tang, S.Y. (2008). The dilemma of field experience assessment: Enhancing professional development or fulfilling a gate-keeping function? Teacher Development, 12(3),
-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13664530802259289
Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, D. J., & Demers, K. E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts. New York: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L, & MacDonald, M. (2000). Where there is learning there is hope: The preparation of teachers at the Bank Street College of Education. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level (1-95). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Davenport, J., & Smetana, L. (2004). Helping new teachers achieve excellence. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Winter.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Duquette, C. (1994). The role of the cooperating teacher in a school-based teacher education program: Benefits and concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(3), 345-353. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)97314-C
Emans, R. (1983). Implementing the knowledge base: Redesigning the function of cooperating teachers and college supervisors. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 14-18. doi: 10.1177/002248718303400304
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17-30. doi: 10.1177/0022487101052001003
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M., (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher education. Teachers College Record, 87(1), 53-65.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 255-273. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(87)90019-9
Feiman-Nemser, S., Parker, M.B., & Zeichner, K. (1993). Are mentor teachers teacher educators? In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger, & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Mentoring: perspectives on school based teacher education (103-120). London: Kogan Page.
Fernandez, M.L. & Erbilgin, E. (2009). Examining the supervision of mathematics student teachers through analysis of conference communications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 93-110. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9185-1
Fletcher, S. (2000). Mentoring in schools: A handbook of good practice. London: Kogan Page.
Griffin, G., Barnes, S., Hughes, R., O’Neal, S., Defino, M., Edwards, S., & Hukill, H. (1983). Clinical preservice teacher’s education: Final report of a descriptive study. Austin, TX: University of Texas, R&D Center for Teacher Education.
Grimmett, P.P., & Ratzlaff, H.C. (1986). Expectations for the cooperating teacher role. Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 41-50. doi: 10.1177/002248718603700607
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers
should learn and be able to do (358-389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hertzog, H.S., & O’Rode, N. (2011). Improving the quality of elementary mathematics student teaching: Using field support materials to develop reflective practice in student teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 89-111. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23479619
Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., ... & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111-132. doi: 10.3102/01623737027002111
Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing Levels and Components of a Math-Talk Learning Community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30034933
Jyrhama, R. (2001, September). What are the ‘right’ questions and what are the ‘right’ answers in teaching practice supervision? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching in Faro, Portugal.
Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157-176. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Los Angeles: Sage.
Lesh, R. A., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. A. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.). Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving (pp. 35-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). Challenging prospective teachers’ beliefs during early field experience: A quixotic undertaking? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 12-20. doi: 10.1177/002248719004100303
McNally, J., Cope, P., & Inglis, B. (1997). The student teacher in school: Conditions for development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 485-498. doi:10.1016/S0742051X(96)00057-1
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moore, R. (2003). Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 31-42. doi: 10.1177/0022487102238656
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2007). Mathematics teaching today: Improving practice, improving student learning. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014): Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
Pena, C., & Almaguer, I. (2007). Asking the right questions: online mentoring of student teachers. International Journal of Instructions Media, 34(1), 105-113.
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Richardson-Koehler, V. (1988). Barriers to the effective supervision of student teaching: A field study. Journal of Teacher Education. 39(2), 28-34. doi: 10.1177/002248718803900206
Scheeler, M. C., McAfee, J. K., Ruhl, K. L., & Lee, D. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 29(1), 12-25. doi: 10.1177/088840640602900103
Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 27(4), 396-407. doi: 10.1177/088840640402700407
Shantz, D., & Ward, T. (2000). Feedback, conversation, and power in the field experience of preservice teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(4), 288-294.
Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 20(8), 1-10.
Steadman, S. C., & Brown, S. D. (2011). Defining the Job of University Supervisor: A Department-Wide Study of University Supervisor's Practices. Issues in Teacher Education, 20(1), 51-68.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Van Houten, R. (1980). Learning through feedback: A systematic approach for improving academic performance. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Meyer, J. P., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Ottmar, E. R. (2014). Introducing an observational measure of standards-based mathematics teaching practices: Evidence of validity and score reliability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 109-128.
Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of teacher education, 53(3), 190-204. doi: 10.1177/0022487102053003002
Zeichner, K.M., & Teitelbaum, K. (1982). Personalized and inquiry-oriented teacher education: An analysis of two approaches to the development of curriculum for field-based experiences. Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 95-177. doi.org/10.1080/0260747820080201
