Using Transactional Distance Theory to Redesign an Online Mathematics Education Course for Pre-Service Primary Teachers

Authors

  • Kevin Larkin Griffith University
  • Romina Jamieson-Proctor University of Southern Queensland

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of a series of design changes to an onlinemathematics education course in terms of transactional distance between learnerand teachers, pre-service education students’ attitudes towards mathematics,and their development of mathematical pedagogical knowledge. Transactional Distance Theory (TDT) was utilised to investigate and describe the interactionsamong course structure, course dialogue and student autonomy in an onlinecourse over a two-year period. Findings indicate that Web 2.0 technologies, when used thoughtfully by teachers, afford high levels of structure anddialogue within the online course. Feedback from pre-service teachers indicatedan improved attitude towards mathematics and an increase in their mathematicalpedagogical content knowledge. These findings have implications for universities moving towards the delivery of teacher education courses entirely online. The provision of supportive learning spaces for mathematics education is a key factor in fostering positive attitudes towards mathematics. This article generates new knowledge as blended and online learning environments in mathematics education have not been investigated using TDT and contributes to the current debate regarding the appropriateness of mathematics education delivered completely online.

Author Biographies

Kevin Larkin, Griffith University

Romina Jamieson-Proctor, University of Southern Queensland

References

AAMT. (2006). Standards of excellence in teaching mathematics in Australian schools. Retrieved from http://www.aamt.edu.au/Activities-and-projects/Standards/Standards-document

Attard, C. (2011). "My favourite subject is mathematics. For some reason no-one really agrees with me": student perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning in the upper primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(3), 363-377. doi: 10.1007/sI3394-011-0020-5

Ball, D., Hill, H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), p. 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.

Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1), 5-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845972

Brady, P., & Bowd, A. (2005). Mathematics anxiety, prior experience and confidence to teach mathematics among pre-service education students. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 37-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337084

Brown, G. (2009). Review of education in mathematics, data science and quantitative disciplines. Report to the Group of Eight Universities. Retrieved from http://www.go8.edu.au/__documents/go8-policy-analysis/2010/go8Mathematicsreview.pdf

Brown, T., Mcnamara, O., Hanley, U., & Jones, L. (1999). Primary student teachers’ understanding of mathematics and its teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 299-322. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250303

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.

Frid, S., Goos, M., & Sparrow, L. (2008/2009). What knowledge is needed for effective teaching of mathematics? Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 10, 1-3.

Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the theoretical impasse: Extending the applications of transactional distance theory. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3).

Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.

Gresham, G. (2007). A study of mathematics anxiety in pre-service teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2) p. 181-188. doi: 10.1007/s10643-007-0174-7

Grootenboer, P. (2008). Mathematical belief change in prospective primary teachers. Journal of Math Teacher Education 11, 479-497. doi: 10.1007/s10857-008-9084-x

Hoogland, C., Jarvis, D., & Gadanidis, G. (2003). ‘Mathematical Romance’ and the online education of elementary pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2003, Chesapeake, VA.

Livy, S., & Vale, C. (2011). First year pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge: Methods of solution for a ratio question. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 22-43.

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.

Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 89-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. Á. (2008). Revisiting transactional distance theory in a context of web-based high-school distance education. Journal of Distance Education (Online), 22(2), 1 - 13.

Newstead, K. (1998). Aspects of children's mathematics anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(1), 53-71.

Niess, M. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and revising teacher preparation. Retrieved from http://math.unipa.it/~grim/21_project/Niess445-449.pdf

Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 78-102.

Peker, M. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ teaching anxiety about mathematics and their learning styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), 335-345.

Polly, D. (2011). Examining how the enactment of TPACK varies across grade levels in mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 37–59.

Rayner, V., Pitsolantis, N., & Osana, H. (2009). Mathematics anxiety in preservice teachers: Its relationship to their conceptual and procedural knowledge of fractions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(3), 60-85.

Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554

Rubinstein, H. (2009). A national strategy for mathematical sciences in Australia. University of Melbourne, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.science.org.au/natcoms/nc-Mathematics/documents/National%20Strategy%20for%20Math%20Sciences%20in%20Australia.pdf

The Design Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-23

Issue

Section

Articles