Struggles Pre-Service Teachers Experience When Taking a Pre-symbolic Algebra Content Course

Authors

  • Siobahn Suppa Stockton University
  • Charles Hohensee University of Delaware

Keywords:

pre-symbolic algebra, pre-service teachers, apprenticeship of observation, consequential transitions

Abstract

Pre-symbolic algebra has been advocated for as a mathematics topic elementary students should experience to better prepare them for middle and high school algebra. However, most elementary pre-service teachers have little to no experience with pre-symbolic algebra. The study reported here analysed the struggles that ten elementary pre-service teachers experienced when learning about pre-symbolic algebra in a mathematics content course. Three types of struggles emerged, struggles with changes in the artifacts of algebra, the objects of algebra, and pre-service teachers’ role while doing algebra. This study could inform efforts to better support elementary PSTs in preparing to teach pre-symbolic algebra.

References

Abrahamson, D. (2015). Reinventing learning: A design‑research odyssey. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(6), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0646-3

Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dball/b

Ball, D. L. (1990). Breaking with experience in learning to teach mathematics: The role of a preservice methods course. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(2), 10–16. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40247978

Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 101–139). Washington, DC: AERA.

Bernard, H. E. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Helping elementary teachers build mathematical generality into curriculum and instruction. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655895

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 5–23). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4

Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/749118

Brown, S. I., Cooney, T. J., & Jones, D. (1990). Mathematics teacher education. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 1 (pp. 639–656). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Buchmann, M. (1989). Breaking from experience in teacher education: When is it necessary? How is it possible? Oxford Review of Education, 15(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498890150206

Cai, J., Ng, S. F., & Moyer, J. C. (2011). Developing students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades: Lessons from China and Singapore. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 25–41). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4

Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Farnsworth, V. (2000). Building a foundation for learning algebra in the elementary grades. In Brief, 1(2), 1–4. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED449015.pdf

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034843

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., & Schwartz, J. L. (2008). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 235–272). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers’ interpretations of students’ mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009999016764

Dickinson, P., & Eade, F. (2004). Using the number line to investigate the solving of linear equations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 41–47. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248457

Ellis, A. B. (2011). Algebra in the middle school: Developing functional relationships through quantitative reasoning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 215–238). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4

Frykholm, J. A. (1996). Pre-service teachers in mathematics: Struggling with the Standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00010-8

Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge, MA; Cambridge University Press.

Holt-Reynolds, D. (1992). Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029002325

Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.

Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it? The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carolyn_Kieran/publication/228526202_Algebraic_thinking_in_the_early_grades_What_is_it/links/53d6e3110cf220632f3df08a.pdf

Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1

Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3

McKenney, K. (2020). Productive struggle for preservice teachers [Manuscript in preparation]. School of Education, University of Delaware.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.

Nicol, C. (1997). Learning to teach prospective teachers to teach mathematics: The struggles of a beginning teacher educator. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 95-116). London, United Kingdom: Falmer.

Reisman, A., Cipparone, P., Jay, L., Monte-Sano, C., Kavanagh, S. S., McGrew, S., & Fogo, B. (2019). Evidence of emergent practice: Teacher candidates facilitating historical discussions in their field placements. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.014

Romberg, T., & Kaput, J. (1999). Mathematics worth teaching, mathematics worth understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 3–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (2011). Developing algebraic thinking in the context of arithmetic. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 43–69). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4

Smith, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0387

Smith, J. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95–132). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Thanheiser, E. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 40(3), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0251

Thanheiser, E. (2018). The effects of preservice elementary school teachers’ accurate self-assessments in the context of whole number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0039

Thomson, M. M., Walkowiak, T. A., Whitehead, A. N., & Huggins, E. (2020). Mathematics teaching efficacy and developmental trajectories: A mixed-methods investigation of novice K-5 teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102953

Van Amerom, B. A. (2002). Reinvention of early algebra [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: The Freudenthal Institute.

Van Reeuwijk, M. (1995). Students’ knowledge of algebra. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference for the Pyschology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 135–150). Recife, Brazil: Program Committee of the 19th PME Conference.

Vanlehn, K., Brown, J. S., & Greeno, J. (1984). Competitive argumentation in computational theories of cognition. In W. Kintsch, J. Miller, & P. Polson (Eds.), Methods and tactics in cognitive science (pp. 235–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wilson, S. (1990). The secret garden of teacher education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(3), 204-209. Retrieved from https://education.msu.edu/NCRTL/PDFs/NCRTL/CraftPapers/cp892.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-07-26