Quality Teaching Rounds in Mathematics Teacher Education

Elena Prieto, Peter Howley, Kathryn Holmes, Judy-anne Osborn, Malcolm Roberts, Andrew Kepert


The purpose of the study reported in this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of an implementation of teaching rounds as a practice-based approach to pre-service teacher education in mathematics. The teaching rounds implemented in the study utilised the NSW Quality Teaching model pedagogical framework as a tool for learning about and reflecting on teaching practices. The evaluation was conducted through a mixed methods approach using a combination of surveys and analysis of student assessment tasks. The major findings of the study are that pre-service teachers found practice-based experience and the subsequent reflections using teaching rounds very valuable compared to other learning experiences. We also found that pre-service teachers undertaking a Masters teaching degree were significantly more insightful about planning for and reflecting about teaching practice than those undertaking an undergraduate degree. We believe these two facts have implications not only at our institution but also at a global level for policy makers in other institutions providing pre-service education.


pre-service teachers; practice-based teacher education; Quality Teaching model; teaching rounds; professional learning communities

Full Text:



Beswick, K., & Goos, M. (2012). Measuring Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 70-90.

Goos, M. (2013). Knowledge for Teaching Secondary School Mathematics: what counts? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(7), 972-983.

Goos, M. (2014). Creating opportunities to learn in mathematics education: a sociocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 439-457.

Gore, J. (2014). Towards quality and equity: The case for Quality Teaching Rounds. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Research Conference, Adelaide, Australia.

Hayes, D., Lingard, R., & Mills, M. (2000). Productive pedagogies. Education Links, 60, 10-13.

Hess, F. (2009). Revitalizing Teacher Education by Revisiting Our Assumptions About Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 450-457.

Le Cornu, R. & Ewing, R. (2008). Reconceptualising professional experiences in pre-service teacher education…reconstructing the past to embrace the future. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1799-1812.

Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003a). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A classroom practice guide. Sydney, NSW: Department of Education and Training, Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.

NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003b). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: An annotated bibliography. Sydney, NSW: Department of Education and Training, Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.

Rowland, T., Turner, F. & Thwaites, A. (2014). Research into Teacher Knowledge: a stimulus for development in mathematics teacher education practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 317-328.

Speer, N., King, K. & Howell, H. (2014). Definitions of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: using these constructs in research on secondary and college mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-18.

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M. & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional Learning Communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.