Learning to teach within practice-based methods courses
Keywords:
prospective teachers, practice-based teacher education, methods coursework, elementary teaching, teacher educationAbstract
Supporting prospective teachers to enact high quality instruction requires transforming their methods preparation. This study follows three teachers through a practice-based elementary methods course. Weekly class sessions took place in an elementary school. The setting afforded opportunities for prospective teachers to engage in cycles of investigation and enactment. The course was focused on learning teaching practices through planning, rehearsing, enacting and reflecting on routine instructional activities that travel back and forth between field-based methods course and field placements. All three teachers grew in their capacity to lead goal-directed lessons by eliciting and responding to students’ thinking. Our analysis connects the teachers’ learning to the intentional design of the methods course.
References
References
Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, & Martin, D.B. (2013). The impact of identify in K-8 mathematics: Rethinking equity-based practice. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook for policy and practice (pp. 3-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497-511.
Bishop, A.L. (1994). Cultural conflicts in mathematics education: Developing a research agenda. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 15-18.
Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R., Jones, D., Agard, P. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.
Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Franke, M.L., Levi, L., Empson, S.B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. J. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 355-374.
Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organizational Science, 10 (4), 381-400.
Cunard, A. (2014). Detailing the work of leading a productive mathematics discussion: A study of a practice-based pedagogy of elementary teacher education. (Doctoral Dissertation).
Ensor, P. (2001). From preservice mathematics teacher education to beginning teaching: A study in recontexualizing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 296-320.
Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225-256). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
Ghousseini, H. (2013). Making a difference: Examining the impact of focusing on core instructional practices in teacher preparation. Paper presentation at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 4, 2014.
Grossman, P. L. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.) Review of research in teacher education. Washington D. C.: American Educational Research Association.
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice; A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2065-2100.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 15, 273-289.
Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs, and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 495-529.
Hunter, R., & Anthony, G. (2011). Forging mathematical relationships in inquiry-based classrooms with Pasifika students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(1), 98-119.
Hunter, R., & Anthony, G. (2012). Designing Opportunities for Prospective Teachers to Facilitate Mathematics Discussions in Classrooms. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Singapore: MERGA.
Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646-682.
Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 59-80.
Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 54-86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Korthagen, F.A.J. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedgogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behaviour and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 98-106.
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and of practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1), 21-34.
Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., Franke, M. (2010) Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching (pp. 129-141). In M.K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.) Instructional explanations in the discipline. New York: Springer.
Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A.C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching in elementary mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226-243.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, and S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pages 63-82). Washington, DC: APA.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. (2013). Core practices and teacher education pedagogies: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 378-386.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Parks, A. N. (2010). Explicit vs. implicit questioning: Inviting all children to think mathematically. Teachers College Record, 112(7), 1871-1896.
Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice build on each other. In E. Amsel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development (pp. 265-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sleep, L. (2012). The work of steering mathematical instruction to a mathematical point: A decomposition of teaching practice. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 935-970.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89-99.
Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376-382.
