Story-problems and Universal Design for Learning for Inclusive and Accessible Mathematics Education: A Study of Italian Preservice Special Education Teachers
Keywords:
pre-service teachers’ education, inclusive mathematics education, UDL, story-problems, multimodalityAbstract
This article reports on a study that explored how narrative problem design and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework support inclusive and accessible mathematics education. The research involved 269 Italian preservice secondary school special education teachers, with the goal of developing competencies in designing inclusive striped problems: mathematical story-problems structured according to Zan’s Context and Question (C&Q) model and enriched through the use of multiple representations in line with UDL. Participants worked in groups to redesign mathematics problems and subsequently completed an individual questionnaire reflecting on inclusive educational design. Data were analysed through a combination of analysis of group designs and deductive qualitative content analysis. Results show that all groups incorporated multiple representations, over half successfully designed striped problems coherent with the C&Q model, and a majority included personalisation for specific disabilities. Questionnaire responses revealed participants’ emerging awareness of narrative coherence, multimodality, and personalisation as interconnected dimensions of inclusive mathematics design. The results of this study suggest that inclusive striped problems are useful for designing inclusive learning activities in mathematics. The study highlights the potential of integrating the C&Q model and UDL in preservice teacher education to foster teachers’ professional identity as designers of inclusive and accessible mathematics learning environments.
References
Albano, G., & Dello Iacono, U. (2019). Designing digital storytelling for mathematics special education: An experience in support teacher education. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1458
Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa RELIME, 9 (Extraordinario 1), 267–299.
Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 2nd revised edition, (pp. 716–745). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2022). Designing inclusive mathematics activities for primary school: The case of the PerContare Project. In A. S. Rodrigues, A. Domingos, A. P. Canavarro, H. Martins, L. Serrazina, & P. C. Teixeira (Eds.), Desenvolvimento curricular. Proceedings of the Encontro de Investigação em Educação Matemática (EIEM2022), Lisbon.
Bertram, J., & Scherer, P. (2022). Pre-service teacher’s beliefs and attitudes about teaching in inclusive mathematics settings. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi, & F. Ferretti (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 12), (pp. 4385–4392). ERME.
Bishop, A., Tan, H., & Barkatsas, T. N. (2015). Diversity in mathematics education: Towards inclusive practices. Springer.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
Canogullari, A., & Radmehr, F. (2026). Task design principles in mathematics education: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 57(4), 615–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2457365
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines: Version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2024). Universal design for learning guidelines: Version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/about-guidelines-3-0/
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational enquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
Cottini, L. (2019). Universal design for learning. Giunti EDU.
Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022). Professional development with universal design for learning: Supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22–37.
Demattè, A. (2011). Tra pensiero logico e narrativo. Una integrazione possibile e necessaria [Between logical and narrative thinking: A possible and necessary integration]. Scuola e Didattica, 16(4), 3-5, 29–30.
Dello Iacono U., & Vivarelli A. (2023). Designing inclusive story‐problems for accessible mathematics: The teacher as “designer”. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, XI, 2, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.7346/sipes-02- 2023-12
Fernandes, S. H. A. A., & Healy, L. (2013). Multimodality and mathematical meaning-making: Blind students’ interactions with symmetry. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 36–55.
Ferrara, F. (2014). How multimodality works in mathematical activity: Young children graphing motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9438-4
Greenstein, S., & Baglieri, S. (2018). Imagining mathematical thinking for inclusive curriculum: A conversation. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 133–144.
Handal, B. (2003). Teachers’ mathematical beliefs: A review. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 47–57.
Harris, J. P. (2004). What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University, .https://www.uwyo.edu/wind/_files/docs/resources/ud_review.pdf
Lambert, R. (2015). Constructing and resisting disability in mathematics classrooms: A case study exploring the impact of different pedagogies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 1–18.
Lambert, R. (2020). Increasing access to universally designed mathematics classrooms. PACE. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605096.pdf
Lambert, R. (2021). The magic is in the margins: Universal design for learning math (UDL Math). Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching Pre–K–12, 114(9), 660–669. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2020.0282
Lambert, R., Imm, K., Schuck, R., Choi, S., & McNiff, A. (2021). UDL is the what, design thinking is the how: Designing for differentiation in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 54–77
Lambert, R., & Sugita, T. (2016). Increasing engagement of students with learning disabilities in mathematical problem-solving and discussion. Support for Learning, 31(4), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12142
Lambert, R., & Tan, P. (2020). Does disability matter in mathematics educational research? A critical comparison of research on students with and without disabilities. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(1), 5–35.
Lambert R., Tan P., Hunt J. & Candela A.G. (2018). Rehumanizing the mathematics education of students with Disabilities: Critical perspectives on research and practice. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1463006
Lewis, K. E., & Lynn, D. M. (2018). An insider’s view of a mathematics learning disability: Compensating to gain access to fractions. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1444927.
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 36–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13.
Mayer, R. (1982). The psychology of mathematical problem solving. In F. L. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 123–138). The Franklin Institute Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The process of understanding mathematical problems. R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 29–53). Routledge.
Meyer, A., & Rose, D. (2005). The future in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. In D. Rose, A. Meyer, & C. Hitchcock (Eds.), The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies (pp. 13–35). Harvard Education Press.
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H. & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Morselli, F., & Robotti, E. (2023). Designing inclusive educational activities in mathematics: The case of algebraic proof. In K. M. Robinson, D. Kotsopoulos, & A. K. Dubé (Eds.). Mathematical teaching and learning: Perspectives on mathematical minds in the elementary and middle school years (pp. 69–87). Springer.
Padilla, A., Lambert, R., Tan, P., & White-Smith, K. (2024). Conceptualizing political knowledges needed to teach inclusive mathematics: theorizing through counterstories. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01598-4
Pisha, B., & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart from the start: The promise of universal design for learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197–203.
Roos, H. (2023). Students’ voices of inclusion in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(2), 229–249.
Scherer, P. (2021). Didactical courses for preparing pre-service teachers for inclusive mathematics classrooms and participants’ competence development. In J. Novotná & H. Moraová (Eds.), SEMT 2021. International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching (pp. 377–386). Charles University.
Scherer, P., & Bertram, J. (2024). Professionalisation for inclusive mathematics: Teacher education programs and changes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs and self-efficacy. ZDM Mathematics Education, 56(3), 447–459
Seitz, S., Häsel-Weide, U., Wilke, Y., Wallner, M., & Heckmann, L. (2020). Expertise von lehrpersonen für inklusiven mathematikunterricht der sekundarstufe: Ausgangspunkte zur professionalisierungsforschung. Kölner Online Journal für Lehrer*innenbildung, 2(2), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/kON/2020.2.03
Tan, P., Padilla, A., & Lambert, R. (2022). A critical review of educator and disability research in mathematics education: A decade of dehumanizing waves and humanizing wakes. Review of Educational Research, 92(6), 871–910. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465432210818
Tan, P., Padilla, A., Mason, E. N., & Sheldon, J. (2019). Humanizing disability in mathematics education: Forging new paths. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Tan, P., & Thorius, K. K. (2018). En/countering inclusive mathematics education: A case of professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 6(2), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.6.2.0052
Tan, P., & Thorius, K. K. (2019). Toward equity in mathematics education for students with dis/abilities: A case study of professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 995–1032. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218811906
Taylor, R. W., & Ringlaben, R. P. (2012). Impacting pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion. Higher Education Studies, 2(3), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n3p16
Walters, L., Green, M., Goldsby, D. & Parker, D. (2018). Digital storytelling as a problem-solving strategy in mathematics teacher education: How making a math-eo engages and excites 21st century students. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 2(1), 1–16. https://ijtes.net/index.php/ijtes/article/view/1570
Watson, A., & Ohtani, M. (Eds.) (2015). Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22. Springer Nature.
Zan, R. (2011). The crucial role of narrative thought in understanding story problems. In K. Kislenko (Ed.), Current state of research on mathematical beliefs. Proceedings of the 16th MAVI (Mathematical Views) Conference, Tallin, Estonia (pp. 331–348).
Zan, R. (2012). La dimensione narrativa di un problema: Il modello C&D per l’analisi e la (ri) formulazione del testo. Partem 1. [The narrative dimension of a problem: The C&D model for text analysis and (re)formulation. Part 1]. L’insegnamento della Matematica e delle Scienze Integrate, 35(2), 107–126.
Zan, R. (2016). I problemi di matematica: difficoltà di comprensione e formulazione del testo [Mathematics problems: Difficulties in understanding and formulating the text]. Carocci Faber.
Zanellato, B. (2024). Problemi a "righe" all'interno di un contesto interculturale. [Problems with "lines" within an intercultural context.] [Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Genova] https://unire.unige.it/handle/123456789/8399
Zappaterra, T. (2014). Formare insegnanti specializzati per il sostegno in Italia. Uno sguardo diacronico. [Training specialized teachers for support in Italy: A diachronic perspective]. MeTis, 4(1), 112–130. https://flore.unifi.it/bitstream/2158/894765/1/Formare%20insegnanti%20specializzati%20per%20il%20sostegno%20in%20Italia.pdf
Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2009). Teaching mathematics as storytelling (pp. 7–8). Sense Publishers.
