Decision-making Skills of Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Designing Numeracy Tasks: A Study of Medium Level Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Keywords:
decision-making, designing, numeracy task, prospective mathematics teacher, pedagogical content knowledgeAbstract
Designing effective, contextual, and meaningful numeracy tasks requires prospective teachers to integrate their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) with robust decision-making skills. This study aimed to explore the decision-making skills of three prospective mathematics teachers with medium-level PCK. They were purposively selected from thirty-one participants based on an initial numeracy task assessment. The analysis intentionally focused on those with medium-level PCK, as it represents a critical transitional level. After completing the task design, in-depth interviews were conducted, and data validity was ensured through member checking. The findings indicate that the participants' decision-making processes contained notable gaps in several parts of task design. The prospective teachers tended to overlook critical task details, focusing mainly on numeracy aspects while neglecting key components of PCK. Their task designs were generally limited to application-level word problems adapted from textbooks by merely altering the context and lacked opportunities for reasoning and creative thinking. They also determined task difficulty based on personal assumptions rather than students' learning needs. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing teacher education curricula by incorporating learning models that foster PCK-based decision-making skills, thereby supporting the holistic professional development of prospective mathematics teachers.
References
Abdillah, A., Nusantara, T., Subanji, Susanto, H., & Abadyo, A. (2016). The students decision making in solving discount problem. International Education Studies, 9(7), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n7p57
Adleff, A.-K., Ross, N., & & König, J. (2023). Types of mathematical tasks in lower secondary classrooms in Germany. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10254-9
Badescu, O., & Stan, C. (2020). Training mathematics teachers for developing critical thinking skills in vigrade pupils. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.2.13
Bali, M. M. E. I., Faradina, U. A., Zahroh, S. F., Sulistiawati, & Faradini, U. A. (2023). Digital literacy and numeracy education to enhance students’ interest in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. International Journal of Sustainable Social Science (IJSSS), 1(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsss.v1i2.1052
Ball, L., Thames, D., & Phelps, M. H. G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2005). Current research on routine decision making: Advances and prospects. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 359–376). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burgos, M., & Godino, J. D.. (2022). Prospective primary school teachers’ competence for analysing the difficulties in solving proportionality problem. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(2), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00344-9
Cockroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools under the Chairmanship of Dr WH Cockcroft. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/cockcroft/cockcroft1982.html#01
Cohen, G., & Cohen, A. (2024). Mapping educators’ insights of student problem-solving difficulties while implementing video-assisted self-regulated learning training in classrooms. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0005
Daher, W., Baya’a, N., & Jaber, O. (2022). Understanding prospective teachers’ task design considerations through the lens of the theory of didactical situations. Mathematics, 10(3), Article 417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030417
Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2023). Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: What can be learned from product evolution? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(1), 109–135.
Geiger, V., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2011). The role of digital technologies in numeracy. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Developing mathematical thinking, Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Pyschology of Mathematics Education, Ankara (Vol. 2, pp. 385–392). PME.
Geiger, V, Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2015). The role of digital technologies in numeracy teaching and learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1115–1137.
Goos, M., Geiger, V., Dole, S., Forgasz, H., & Bennison, A. (2019). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based strategies for enhancing teaching and learning (1st ed.). Allen & Unwin.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Klein, S., & Leikin, R. (2020). Opening mathematical problems for posing open mathematical tasks: What do teachers do and feel? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 349–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09983-y
Kooloos, C., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., van Boven, S., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, J. (2022). Building on student mathematical thinking in whole‑class discourse : Exploring teachers’ in‑the‑moment decision‑making, interpretation, and underlying conceptions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09499-z
Kosko, K. W. (2016). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers decision making: The questions they ask and the tasks they select. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Pyschology of Mathematics Education, Tuscon, Arizona (pp. 1341–1344).
Lee, J.-E., Flavin, E., & Hwang, S. (2024). Preservice teachers’ task identification and modification related to cognitive demand. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(4), 707–737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09661-3
Lestari, N. D. S. (2020). Profil pedagogical content knowledge mahasiswa pendidikan matematika dalam mengajarkan literasi matematis ditinjau berdasarkan perbedaan gender [Pedagogical content knowledge profile of mathematics education students in teaching mathematical literacy reviewed based on gender differences]. Universitas Negeri Surabaya].
Lestari, N. D. S., Juniati, D., & Suwarsono, S. (2019). Integrating mathematical literacy toward mathematics teaching: The pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of prospective math teacher in designing the learning task. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012131
Marco, N., & Palatnik, A. (2024). From “learning to variate” to “variate for learning.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73, 101119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101119
Margulies, K. B. (2022). An innovative way of teaching and assessing critical thinking in mathematics (pp. 267–272). https://doi.org/10.37626/ga9783959872188.0.049
Mellroth, E., Bergwall, A., & Nilsson, P. (2021). Task design for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability mathematics classrooms: Manifestations of contradictions in a professional learning community. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 113–135.
Murtafiah, W., Lukitasari, M., & Lestari, N. D. S. (2021). Exploring the decision-making process of pre-service teachers in solving mathematics literacy problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.2.13908.145-160.
Murtafiah, W., Sa’dijah, C., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo. (2023). Decision making of prospective mathematics teacher in designing of Cartesian coordinate teaching. The 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Learning Research (ICOMER): AIP Conference. Proceedings, 2886(1), 020052.. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154626
Murtafiah, W., Sa’dijah, C., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo, S. (2019). Decision making of the winner of the National Student Creativity Program in designing ICT-based learning media. TEM Journal, 8(3), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM83-49
Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., & Lithner, J. (2023). Shifts in student attention on algorithmic and creative practice tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(2), 273–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10250-z
Obi, J. N., & Agwu, E. (2017). Effective decision-making and organizational goal achievement in a depressive economy. International Journal of Research and Development Studies, 8(1), 1-12.
OECD. (2023). Program For International Student (PISA) 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-assessment-and-analytical-framework_dfe0bf9c-en
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy : Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Özen, D., & Köse, N. Y. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ understandings of exploratory task design in mathematics: From GeoGebra task design to the 8th grade studen. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2421088. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2421088
Peled, I., & Balacheff, N. (2011). Modeling conceptions and controls in task examples with simple word problems. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(2), 307–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-011-0310-0
Piñeiro, J. L., Chapman, O., Castro-Rodríguez, E., & Castro, E. (2022). Prospective primary teachers’ initial mathematical problem-solving knowledge. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(8), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2107958
Possamai, J. P., & Allevato, N. (2024). Teaching mathematics through problem posing: Elements of the task. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73, 101133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101133
Radmehr, F. (2023). Toward a theoretical framework for task design in mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp189-204
Säfström, A. I., Lithner, J., Palm, T., Palmberg, B., Sidenvall, J., Andersson, C., Boström, E., & Granberg, C. (2023). Developing a diagnostic framework for primary and secondary students’ reasoning difficulties during mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115, 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10278-1
Sari, Y. M., Kohar, A. W., El Milla, Y. I., Fiangga, S., & Rahayu, D. S. (2024). Aligning numeracy task design with SDG goals: Nutrition facts as a context for prospective mathematics teachers’ problem posing. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp191-206
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations for the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Suryanti, S., Nusantara, T., Parta, I. N., & Irawati, S. (2022). Problem-based task in teacher training program: Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp257-274
Suwarno. (2019). How to make an ill-structured problem to be well done? A study about decision making of pre-service math teacher in completing the structure. International Journal of Insight for Mathematic Teaching (IJOIMT), 02(1), 1–10.
Suwarno, S., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Irawati, S. (2022). The decision making strategy of prospective mathematics teachers in improving LOTS to be HOTS problem. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis Applications, 13(1), 1613–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2022.5776
Swartz, R. J., Fischer, S. D., & Parks, S. (1998). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into secondary science: A lesson design handbook. Critical Thinking Books & Software.
Taufiq, T., Budiarto, M. T., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (n.d.). Exploring what teacher’s decision-making in designing mathematical assignments?: Case studies in beginne. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.377
Tout, D., Coben, D., Geiger, V., Ginsburg, L., & Hoogland, K. (2017). Review of the PIAAC Numeracy Assessment Framework: Final report. https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/Review of the PIAAC Numeracy Assessment Framework_2017_ACER.pdf
Wang, M., Mohd Matore, M. E. M., & Rosli, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: Trends across time and countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1523836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523836
Zafar, M. I., Ahmad, S., Akhtar, S., & Yousaf, H. (2017). Socio-cultural dimensions of management in decision making. In M. Ashfaq & S. A. Adil (Eds.), Economics for Business Managers, (pp. 117–135). University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.
