Mathematics teachers’ first engagement with research articles in mathematics education: Sketches of new praxeologies

Annette Rouleau


This study is concerned with the first experiences of in-service mathematics teachers in consuming scholarly mathematics education literature. Growing from the meta-didactical transposition model (Arzarello et al. 2014), we were interested in the praxeologies that may develop from teachers’ engagement with research articles. The data were collected in a cohort of thirteen teachers who read, interpreted, critiqued, and designed a follow-up to an empirical article as part of a master’s level course in mathematics education. The teachers reported that such a consumption of research contributed to the expansion of their mathematical knowledge, instigated changes in their teaching of particular concepts, and provided them with ideas for enacting this change. Furthermore, we explore how engagement with an article shaped the teachers’ understandings about research in mathematics education.


teacher education; teacher-researchers; praxeology; meta-didactical tranposition;


Andrà, C., & Brunetto, D. (2018). The first research paper in mathematics education: A beginner and his young mentor talk about their experience. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(1), 21–28.

Arzarello, F., Robutti, O., Sabena, C., Cusi, A., Garuti, R., Malara, N., & Martignone, F. (2014). Meta-didactical transposition: A theoretical model for teacher education programmes. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Era: An International Perspective on Technology Focused Professional Development (pp. 347–372). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.rog/10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1

Bartels, N. (2003). How teachers and researchers read academic articles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(7), 737–753.

Boaler, J., Ball, D., & Even, R. (2003). Preparing researchers for disciplined inquiry: Learning from, in, and for practice. In A. Bishop & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 491–521). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Bosch, M. (2014). Research on university mathematics education within the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic: Methodological principles and open questions. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 112–116.

Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Burke, L., Schlenk, E., Sereika, S., Cohen, S., Happ, M., & Dorman, J. (2005). Developing research competence to support evidence-based practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 358–363.

Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Chernoff, E., & Russell, G. (2013). Comparing the relative likelihood of events: The fallacy of composition. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 333–340. Chicago, IL: PME-NA.

Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.

Chevallard, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: Perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12(1), 73–112.

Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton (Ed.), The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study (pp. 273–280). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Even, R. (2003). What can teachers learn from research in mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 38–42.

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.

Groth, R. & Bergner, J. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives on mathematics education research reports. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 809–825.

Hammersley, M. (2002). Educational research: Policymaking and practice. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Haser, Ç. (2018). Key experiences in becoming an independent mathematics education researcher. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(1), 29–41.

Hiebert. E. (2014). Students’ understanding of square numbers and square roots. In S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, (3), 297–304. Vancouver, Canada: PME.

Jasper, B., & Taube, S. (2004). Action research of elementary teachers’ problem-solving skills before and after focused professional development. Teacher Education and Practice, 17(3), 299–310.

Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Lesh, R., Behr, M., & Post, T. (1987). Rational number relations and proportions. In C. Janvier (Ed), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Routledge.

Lester, F., & Lambdin, D. (1998). The ship of Theseus and other metaphors for thinking about what we value in mathematics education research. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (vol. 2, pp. 415–425). London, UK: Kluwer.

Lester, F., & Lambdin, D. (2003). From amateur to professional: The emergence and maturation of the US mathematics education research community. A History of School Mathematics, 2, 1629–1700.

Liljedahl, P. (2018). Mathematics education graduate students’ thoughts about becoming researchers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(1), 42–57.

MacDonald, M., Badger, R., & White, G. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning and teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 949–963.

Mamolo, A. (2014). Cardinality and cardinal number of an infinite set: A nuanced relationship. In S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, (4), 169–176. Vancouver, Canada: PME.

McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2004). The critical role of institutional context in teacher development. In M. Høines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of 28th Annual Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (3), 281–288. Bergen, Norway: PME.

Nardi, E. (2015). “Not like a big gap, something we could handle”: Facilitating shifts in paradigm in the supervision of mathematics graduates upon entry into mathematics education. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 135–156.

Prodromou, T., Robutti, O., & Panero, M. (2017). Making sense out of the emerging complexity inherent in professional development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 445–473.

Reis‐Jorge, J. (2005). Developing teachers' knowledge and skills as researchers: A conceptual framework. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 303–319.

Reys, R. (2018). The preparation of a mathematics educator: The case of Carey. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(1), 58–67.

Shulman, L. (2010). Doctoral education shouldn't be a marathon. The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review 56(30), 9–12.

Sirotic, N., & Zazkis, R. (2005). Locating irrational numbers on the number line. In G. Lloyd, M. Wilson, J. Wilkins, & S. Behm (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1–7. Raleigh, NC: PME-NA.

Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.

Star, S. & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

Thanheiser, E., Ellis, A., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2012). From dissertation to publication in JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(2), 144–158.

van Someren, M., Barnard, Y., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. London, UK: Academic Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Wilkie, K. (2017). The challenge of changing teaching: Investigating the interplay of external and internal influences during professional learning with secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-30.

Wilson, S. (2006). Finding a canon and core: Meditations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 315–325.

Zeuli, J. (1994). How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 39–55.


  • There are currently no refbacks.