Edwina Butler, Elena Prieto, Judy-anne Osborn, Peter Howley, Adam Lloyd, Andrew Kepert, Malcolm Roberts


Improving mathematics education is an issue that arises periodically in the media and is the object of frequent, and sometimes contradictory, policy efforts and academic endeavours. Strategies used to tackle this issue range from raising requirements for tertiary entry to focussing on innovative pedagogies. One strategy with the potential to enhance pre-service teacher education is to improve collaboration between the stakeholders charged with providing this education: mathematicians and teacher educators. However, finding ways to enhance collaboration across discipline boundaries remains largely unexplored in this context.

This paper studies the development of a multidisciplinary team of university academics collaborating to improve mathematics pre-service teacher education. To facilitate this collaboration and shared learning, a narrative inquiry process was utilised. The process enabled members to explore, deepen and sustain their connections with one another and their understanding of the shared focus underpinning their work as teacher educators. Our thematic analysis of the narratives obtained, highlights factors that enhance or potentially hinder multidisciplinary interactions and learning. Multidisciplinary teams may use their increased knowledge of these factors, and the process of narrative inquiry itself, to reflect upon their current and future collaborations, thus allowing such teams to preclude, manage as well as respond to challenges in ways that can ultimately enhance pre-service teacher education.


mathematics education; narrative inquiry; multidisciplinary collaboration


Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (2013). Doing narrative research: Sage.

Boden, D., & Borrego, M. (2011). Academic Departments and Related Organizational Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research. Higher Education in Review, 8.

Borrego, M., Boden, D., & Newswander, L. K. (2014). Sustained change: Institutionalizing interdisciplinary graduate education. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 858-885.

Carroll, L., Ali, M. K., Cuff, P., Huffman, M. D., Kelly, B. B., Kishore, S. P., Vedanthan, R. (2014). Envisioning a transdisciplinary university. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 42(s2), 17-25.

Daiute, C. (2013). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach: Sage Publications.

Dillon, P. (2008). A pedagogy of connection and boundary crossings: methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and between disciplines. Innovations in Education and teaching International, 45(3), 255-262.

Duffield, S., Olson, A., & Kerzman, R. (2013). Crossing borders, breaking boundaries: Collaboration among higher education institutions. Innovative Higher Education, 38(3), 237-250.

Goos, M. (2014). Creating opportunities to learn in mathematics education: a sociocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 439-457.

Goos, M. (2015). Learning at the boundaries. In V. G. M. Marshman, & A. Bennison (Ed.), Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Conference (pp. 269-276). Sunshine Coast, Australia: MERGA.

Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional care, 19(sup1), 188-196.

Ness, I. J., & Riese, H. (2015). Openness, curiosity and respect: Underlying conditions for developing innovative knowledge and ideas between disciplines. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 29-39.

NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: An annotated bibliography. Sydney, NSW.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London, UK: Sage.

Schaffer, S. P., Lei, K., & Paulino, L. R. (2008). A framework for cross-disciplinary team learning and performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 7.

Seethaler, S., Czworkowski, J., Remmel, J., Sawrey, B. A., & Souviney, R. (2013). Bridging the Divide Between Science and Education: Lessons From a Fruitful Collaboration. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(1), 54-59.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Vanasupa, L., McCormick, K. E., Stefanco, C. J., Herter, R. J., & McDonald, M. (2012). Challenges in transdisciplinary, integrated projects: Reflections on the case of faculty members’ failure to collaborate. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 171-184.

Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35-45.

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity: Cambridge university press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.